Working
paper
Possibilities of applying a Decision Support
Frame on sea level rise and other natural hazards to support spatial planning
and regional development in
South and South East Asia
Philipp
Schmidt-Thomé, Geological Survey of Finland
Philipp.schmidt-thome@gtk.fi
The
Geological Survey of Finland (GTK) is currently leading two projects on spatial
planning responses towards advert effects of natural hazards and climate change
on the socio economic development in Europe and the Baltic Sea Region,
respectively, please see WWW links for more information. (www.gtk.fi/projects/espon and www.gtk.fi/projects/seareg). A new
project focusing on integrated hazard mapping in the EU has just started
(ARMONIA, no website available yet). GTK has received very positive feedback on
these projects, in Asia also from the Coordinating Committee for Geoscience
programmes in South and South East Asia (CCOP) and the Thai Department of
Mineral Resources. Conversations with the Thai representatives and CCOP lead to
the initiative of presenting GTK's current activities in environmental risks
and related issues to the CCOP Steering Committee. The present paper gives some
background on the talks held so far and give a basic outline on possibilities
of future cooperation.
1
Background:
In November 2003 the BSR Interreg
IIIB project "Sea Level Rise Affecting the Spatial Development of the
Baltic Sea Region" (SEAREG) was contacted by Mr. Worawoot Tantiwanit,
Director for Natural Hazards and Environmental Geology of the Thai Department
for Mineral Resources (DMR). He was interested in studying the possibilities of
applying the Decision Support Frame (DSF) that is currently being developed by
the SEAREG project, in Thailand and other parts of South East Asia (SEA). The
main interest in the SEAREG project and its DSF consists of the active
partnership of spatial planners in a project that focuses on the effects and
impacts of sea level rise, as well as on structural funding for regional
cohesion and cross border cooperation. Additionally, Mr. Tantiwanit expressed
his interest in a combination of the DSF with the development of natural hazard
and risk maps that are currently developed under the European Spatial Planning
Observation Network's 1.3.1 project “HAZARDS”. The BSR Interreg IIIB Joint
Secretariat in Rostock permitted the use of SEAREG project funds to organize a
workshop in Thailand to present the project concept and the results of the
SEAREG project, and also to study the possibilities of future EU - SEA
cooperation.
2
Workshop on natural hazard mitigation and spatial planning, Bangkok 2004
The DMR organized a workshop and meetings with
local experts and planners in the field of geosciences, natural hazards and
coastal protection, and an excursion to study current environmental and socio
economic effects of coastal erosion. After the presentation of both the SEAREG
and the HAZARDS projects, a discussion developed on the applicability of a DSF
on sea level rise in Thailand and the possibility of developing risk maps on
natural hazards to support spatial planning. The focus lied on the current
environmental and socio economic effects of coastal erosion and the possible
impact of sea level rise. In addition, other natural hazards in coastal zones
were discussed, e.g. landslides, forest fires and storm surges. Rising sea
level can increase the risk of technological hazards in SEA's coastal areas,
e.g. industrial and agricultural pollution. The concept of structural funding
and regional cohesion found a very positive response, because SEA countries
have big urban-rural disparities and experience a strong migration into urban
areas. For instance, the Thai government is currently planning to invest large
funds in the development of its three southernmost provinces. A combined
SEAREG/HAZARDS project could help to support the sustainability of these
investments and the possibilities of implementing a project that develops both
natural hazard and risk maps and designs a DSF for mitigation activities from
the planning side were discussed. Following the SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses,
Opportunities and Threats) approach, the added value and the difficulties of
cooperation between scientist and planners among several SEA and South Asian
partner countries could be assessed in detail. Such a project would mark an
innovative approach, because of both its interdisciplinary character (various
Departments, natural and socio-economical scientists, spatial planners) and the
cross border (inter-regional) cooperation.
The main conclusion from the workshop was that
both project approaches, i.e. of SEAREG and ESPON_HAZARDS are innovative and
unpreceeded in SEA. A combination of the two approaches will be an interesting
challenge for SEA to achieve positive effects on designing sustainable
mitigation plans on natural hazards. The frame of regional cohesion and
interregional cooperation is a very interesting aspect in trying to solve the
current problems of regional disparities and subsequent urban-rural migration.
The represented Thai Departments and the German Federal Institute for
Geosciences and Natural Resources (BGR) would
welcome such a cooperation initiative.
3
Meeting with the Coordinating Committee for Geoscience Programmes in East and
South East Asia (CCOP):
The director of CCOP, Mr. Chen, and the
regional expert Dr. David invited the SEAREG and HAZARDS projects to give a
presentation and study possible project applications in the CCOP area. Both of
the projects were received with great interest and the possibilities of a
further development of the methods in the CCOP region were discussed in detail,
leading to the conclusion that CCOP would definitely support such an integrated
approach. It was agreed that Mr. Chen would present a possible project on sea
level rise, natural hazards and risk mapping for regional cohesion and
interregional cooperation to the CCOP members during the annual meeting in March
2004. CCOP will take the initiative in contacting the envisaged project partner
countries Vietnam, Cambodia and Malaysia, also to discuss the financial
contribution of these envisaged partner countries.
4
Conclusions
A further development of the tools generated by
the BSR Interreg IIIB project "SEAREG" can be very successful in the
context of spatial planning responses towards natural hazards. An integration
of the methodologies developed in the ESPON HAZARDS project appears to be
useful to obtain an overview on the regional distribution of hazards and risks.
The visited Thai and Asian institutions showed great interest in both projects,
especially in coastal zone management and planning as well as regional cohesion
and cross border cooperation. The interest in a joint project approach on
hazards and planning is high and the added value of cooperating from region to
region (EU-SEA) was clearly pointed out during the discussions. Via CCOP it
would also be very interesting to widen this project idea towards South Asian
countries. The CCOP Steering Committee meeting in Japan 2004 is an excellent
platform to start cooperation initiatives.
One main
target that has to be addressed during further project proposal discussions is
the possibility of funding such an initiative. Currently there are no special
calls for such projects from the EU, so other funding sources would be an
important option.
Annex:
Report on the excursion to the Rayong Province:
The excursion on examples of current coastal
erosion problems in Thailand led to the Rayong Province, ca 140 km southeast of
Bangkok. Four main impact areas of coastal erosion were visited: Housing and
infrastructure, tourism and industrial sites.
I The
coast along Rayong city
The first stops were along the coast of Rayong
city, starting from a public beach area, over a housing area down to the Rayong
river mouth. The entire coastal area suffers from severe erosion and presently
different structures are tested to protect the coast. Figure 1 below gives a
non-scaled schematic overview of the coastal protection measurements and their
effects along the coast of Rayong city from East to West (river mouth). The red
line represents the coastal road. In the east, the road is already eroded so
strongly, that it is closed for traffic (see pictures 1 and 2).
Figure 1:
Non-scaled schematic overview on the coastal areas of Rayong city (P. Schmidt-Thomé)
Groynes constructed perpendicularly to the
coastline give a better erosion protection (picture 2). Other construction
types are coast-parallel groynes. They hinder erosion and lead to the
sedimentation semi circled beaches (picture 3). On the other hand "Y"
shaped groynes that are inter linked by a short coast parallel groyne between
them do not protect the coastline but lead to further erosion that already
starts to affect the coastal road (pictures 4 and 5). The currents inside these
"Y" shaped constructions are so strong that sediments deposited along
these groyne's are already as high as the construction itself, i.e. a storm
surge easily reaches over the groynes and weakens its structure (picture 5).
The impacts of the coastal protection measures
in Rayong city are manifold. First, the erosion of the coast is only partly
stopped, partly it is only transferred along the coast towards other areas.
Secondly, the coast parallel groynes along the sandy beach lead to a change in
the coastal morphology. The resulting beach shape is not necessarily
satisfactorily for tourist expectations of a recreation area and tourism
declines. Recent investments in coastal infrastructure, such as the pavement of
the road and the construction of new housing areas are either being destroyed
by the advancing sea or abandoned (picture 6). Consequently, the economically
important tourism in Rayong city is declining and people are starting to move
out of the area. The present coastal erosion in Rayong leads to the assumption
that a rising sea level is most probably going to increase the current erosion
problems. The coastal erosion has a strong impact on many areas, such as
infrastructure, housing, industry, tourism, etc.
The Rayong area requires appropriate mitigation
activities, developed together with spatial planners and with the goal of
long-term strategies, to lessen the negative impact and focus on sustainability
in the further development.

Picture 1, eroded road close to
Rayong City (P. Schmidt-Thomé)

Picture 2: Eroded road and coastal
protection measures with perpendicular groyne's
(P. Schmidt-Thomé)

Picture
3: Semi lunar shaped beach morphology caused by coast parallel groyne's (P. Schmidt-Thomé)

Picture 4: Y-shaped groyne, soon
covered by sediments (P. Schmidt-Thomé)

Picture
5: Erosion prone road behind Y-shaped groynes (P. Schmidt-Thomé)

Picture 6: Abandoned housing along
eroded coastline (P. Schmidt-Thomé)
II Koh
Samet
Koh Samet is an island in the close vicinity of
Bangkok that is a famous attraction and holiday spot for both Thai and
international tourists. Nevertheless, the advancing coastal erosion leads to
severe problems. Some of the island's beaches have already been totally eroded
and some adjacent bungalows are no longer in use. In other areas, the water
line is moving closer towards the tourist infrastructure steadily, see picture
7. According to a local coastal expert, the coastline in picture 7 retreated
approximately 2-3m over the last three years.

Picture 7: Advancing coastal erosion
on Koh Samet (P. Schmidt-Thomé)
Picture 8 shows that this beach has already
been eroded that far that the seawater already regularly reaches some
restaurants during high tides. The sand bags offer merely a small protection.
In order to maintain the tourist attraction of this island it could be helpful
to discuss on integrated coastal zone management.
The financial losses, including the socio-economic impacts for the region in
case of further advancing coastal erosion, might have a rather high impact on
the Rayong Province.

Picture 8: Regularly flooded
restaurant in Koh Samet (P. Schmidt-Thomé)
III
Industrial area W of Rayong city.
The current land use is an oil refinery and oil
derivates storage facilities. Additionally, the area is currently being
evaluated as a future location for a nuclear power plant. The coastal erosion
in the area is strong and so far, the coastal protection was unsuccessful. A
large part of a former sea wall is already washed away and the erosion has
advanced ca. 50m into the former main land (see picture.9). Further investments
in this area should be studied in detail in order to avoid major financial
losses.
Picture
9: Eroded sea wall (red dotted line) and new coastline (P. Schmidt-Thomé)